A viewset for viewing and editing Full Time Bureaucrats.

GET /api/sc/full-time-bureaucrats/?format=api&page=8
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "count": 493,
    "next": "https://seshat-db.com/api/sc/full-time-bureaucrats/?format=api&page=9",
    "previous": "https://seshat-db.com/api/sc/full-time-bureaucrats/?format=api&page=7",
    "results": [
        {
            "id": 352,
            "polity": {
                "id": 669,
                "name": "ni_hausa_k",
                "long_name": "Hausa bakwai",
                "start_year": 900,
                "end_year": 1808
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " “The court dignitaries managed the affairs of the palace and the city. The composition of the list and the duties varied from one state to another, but their role was above all administrative. In Katsina, the most important officials included the Galadima (who deputized for the Sarki), the Ajiya (treasurer), the Turaki and Shantali (protocol officers) and the Madawaki (officer-in-charge of the royal stables).53 They were in a position to act as middlemen between the Sarki and the regional governments.” §REF§Ogot, B. (Ed.). (1998). Africa from the Sixteenth to the Eighteenth century. Heinemann; University of California Press: 467. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/M4FMXZZW/collection§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 353,
            "polity": {
                "id": 670,
                "name": "ni_bornu_emp",
                "long_name": "Kanem-Borno",
                "start_year": 1380,
                "end_year": 1893
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " “From evidence at our disposal it is possible for us to conclude that it was, by and large, the resourcefulness and ingenuity of the early Borno rulers that enabled them to evolve not only a complex governmental machinery which came to be an object of imitation by later developing neighbouring states, but also the unique system of granting mahrams to its notables, especially scholars.” §REF§AMINU, M. (1981). THE PLACE OF MAHRAMS IN THE HISTORY OF KANEM-BORNO. Journal of the Historical Society of Nigeria, 10(4), 31–38: 33. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/5ERZU7K2/collection§REF§ “In their capacities as administrators, members of the court were called chima kura, literally, big tax collector. Chima kura were responsible for the administration of their own districts, units of which were usually scattered geographically throughout the kingdom. They appointed slaves or clients as resident administrators for these smaller sub-units or fiefs, who were called chima gana (small tax collector).” §REF§Brenner, Louis. “SOURCES OF CONSTITUTIONAL THOUGHT IN BORNO.” Journal of the Historical Society of Nigeria, vol. 7, no. 1, 1973, pp. 49–65: 52.https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/BGCV72TB/collection§REF§ "
        },
        {
            "id": 354,
            "polity": {
                "id": 671,
                "name": "ni_dahomey_k",
                "long_name": "Foys",
                "start_year": 1715,
                "end_year": 1894
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " Full-time specialists. There were clearly bureaucratic roles, but I can’t find confirmation that they were full-time. “Other sources suggest, however, that subsequent rulers experimented with novel political strategies, including the expansion of bureaucratic control over Dahomean territories. For example, eighteenth-century sources identify a core group of high ministers, or bonugan daho, who provided support for the expanding state. Under King Gezo, the palace became the residence of additional female officials, or begani, who corresponded to the major male dignitaries and their subordinates. In all, these officers, male and female, were state-appointed officials, charged with directly administering various political, economic, military and religious sectors of the kingdom. Additionally, whereas eighteenth-century sources are relatively silent on the nature of regional governance, by the nineteenth century, towns throughout Dahomey were clearly managed by officials sent from Abomey. Indeed, major centers like Whydah and Allada, as well as minor towns such as Whegbo, were divided into quarters, each of which was controlled by lower-ranking officials 'who regulate their own departments, and distribute justice except in some extraordinary cases which are referred to Abomey'.” §REF§Monroe, J. C. (2007). Continuity, Revolution or Evolution on the Slave Coast of West Africa? Royal Architecture and Political Order in Precolonial Dahomey. The Journal of African History, 48(3), 349–373: 355. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/ASTPFKNP/collection§REF§ “Long-term political stability in Dahomey was facilitated by the creation of a centralized state bureaucracy designed to project royal control over critical economic interests. This bureaucracy was built upon existing political foundations, flexibly redesigned and expanded to deal with the changing dynamics of internal Dahomean politics as well as the shifting tides of the Atlantic trade. By the nineteenth century, Dahomey emerged from this tumultuous era with a government system clearly more effective at centralizing administrative control over its interests than its predecessors on the Slave Coast. Thus, although Dahomey may not have brought about a 'revolution* in political order, it clearly represents dramatic 'evolution' in the nature of administrative organization on the Slave Coast of West Africa.” §REF§Monroe, J. C. (2007). Continuity, Revolution or Evolution on the Slave Coast of West Africa? Royal Architecture and Political Order in Precolonial Dahomey. The Journal of African History, 48(3), 349–373: 373. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/ASTPFKNP/collection§REF§ “Akinjogbin sees the central governments' members as exercising strict control over events in every part of the country. The central government had, it appears, stationed in each of the country's various localities representatives who both maintained law and order and saw to the implementation of national policy. The national government was able to keep in touch with its local representatives by drawing on the services of a group of \"messengers-cum-civil-servants\" or Illari. These were \"sent to any part of the kingdom and thus used to check any remote officer or co-ordinate any national plans.\" Eighteenth-century Dahomey was, by this account, a nation state whose bureaucratic government was fairly similar to that of some of the states of contemporary Western Europe.” §REF§Ross, D. (1983). European Models and West African History: Further Comments on the Recent Historiography of Dahomey. History in Africa, 10, 293–305: 294. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/WF92T7BH/collection§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 355,
            "polity": {
                "id": 607,
                "name": "si_early_modern_interior",
                "long_name": "Early Modern Sierra Leone",
                "start_year": 1650,
                "end_year": 1896
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "absent",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " The following directly applies to northern Sierra Leone, but, based on Fyle and Foray's assertion that \"[p]olitical systems in the Sierra Leone area were fairly similar in structure,\"§REF§(Fyle and Foray 2006: xxx) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM.§REF§it seems reasonable to infer that it can be applied to the whole of Sierra Leone's interior. \"The precolonial sociopolitical organization of northern Sierra Leone is difficult to characterize, in part because of the limited information available prior to the late nineteenth century. [...] Features of centralized political authority (e.g., Cohen 1991; Southhall 1988, 1991), such as institutionalized bureaucracy, taxation, centralized redistribution of goods and labor, stratified accumulation of wealth, and military control, that have been traditionally seen as markers of state-level organization were limited.\"§REF§(DeCorse 2012: 285) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/7FGSKCDI/collection.§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 356,
            "polity": {
                "id": 612,
                "name": "ni_nok_1",
                "long_name": "Middle and Late Nok",
                "start_year": -1500,
                "end_year": -901
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "absent",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " \"In sum, we have not found unambiguous evidence of social complexity and the often suggested highly advanced social system of the Nok Culture.\" §REF§(Breunig and Ruppe 2016: 251) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/ES4TRU7R.§REF§ "
        },
        {
            "id": 357,
            "polity": {
                "id": 613,
                "name": "bf_west_burkina_faso_yellow_5",
                "long_name": "West Burkina Faso Yellow I",
                "start_year": 100,
                "end_year": 500
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "absent",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " The following reconstruction of small communities consisting of extended families based in autonomous homesteads suggests minimal social diffrentiation. ”For the first 400 years of the settlement's history, Kirikongo was a single economically generalized social group (Figure 6). The occupants were self-sufficient farmers who cultivated grains and herded livestock, smelted and forged iron, opportunistically hunted, lived in puddled earthen structures with pounded clay floors, and fished in the seasonal drainages. [...] Since Kirikongo did not grow (at least not significantly) for over 400 years, it is likely that extra-community fissioning continually occurred to contribute to regional population growth, and it is also likely that Kirikongo itself was the result of budding from a previous homestead. However, with the small scale of settlement, the inhabitants of individual homesteads must have interacted with a wider community for social and demographic reasons. [...] It may be that generalized single-kin homesteads like Kirikongo were the societal model for a post-LSA expansion of farming peoples along the Nakambe (White Volta) and Mouhoun (Black Volta) River basins. A homestead settlement pattern would fit well with the transitional nature of early sedentary life, where societies are shifting from generalized reciprocity to more restricted and formalized group membership, and single-kin communities like Kirikongo's house (Mound 4) would be roughly the size of a band.”§REF§(Dueppen 2012: 27, 32)§REF§ "
        },
        {
            "id": 358,
            "polity": {
                "id": 615,
                "name": "ni_nok_2",
                "long_name": "Middle and Late Nok",
                "start_year": -900,
                "end_year": 0
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "absent",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " \"In sum, we have not found unambiguous evidence of social complexity and the often suggested highly advanced social system of the Nok Culture.\" §REF§(Breunig and Ruppe 2016: 251) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/ES4TRU7R.§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 359,
            "polity": {
                "id": 624,
                "name": "zi_great_zimbabwe",
                "long_name": "Great Zimbabwe",
                "start_year": 1270,
                "end_year": 1550
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "absent",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " Full-time specialists most likely absent, their duties being fulfilled by the chiefs and other social leaders of communities within the social hierarchy, if Great Zimbabwe was organized along the same lines as the Karanga, as Chirikure suggests. “Great Zimbabwe is a ruined Shona city or guta which controlled a sizeable territory…. As a collection of homesteads and misha, the guta had no formalised bureaucracy, no formalised division of labour or occupational specialisations… // … In general [in Karanga society], imba…, was the smallest and lowest level social unit. A collection of dzimba formed misha…. A group of misha formed dunhu…. A group of matunhu formed a state (nyika) under a chief (ishe/mambo/changamire)…. Each level performed administrative, economic, religious, and political roles consistent with rank.” §REF§ (Chirikure 2021, 258-267) Shadreck Chirikure, Great Zimbabwe: Reclaiming a ‘Confiscated’ Past (Routledge, 2021). Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/MWWKAGSJ/collection §REF§.  "
        },
        {
            "id": 360,
            "polity": {
                "id": 683,
                "name": "ug_buganda_k_2",
                "long_name": "Buganda II",
                "start_year": 1717,
                "end_year": 1894
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "absent",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " Inferred from the fact that full-time specialised bureaucracy does not seem to have emerged in the broader Great Lakes region prior to the colonial era. For example, in Nkore, \"The royal court served as a judicial and political center, but not as a bureaucratic focal point. The Mugabe's chief minister, the Enganzi, was not a prime minister in the usual sense of leader of government business. He was merely the King's favorite. Neither was there a cabinet nor governmental bureaux [...]. No distinction between the royal and state treasury was made and the heads of local administrative units were not required to attend court or reside at the capital as in Buganda, for instance.\"§REF§(Steinhart 1978: 144) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/D3FV7SKV/collection.§REF§ In Rwanda: \"In this sort of government, administration was not yet institutionalized.\"§REF§(Vansina 2004: 63) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/5J4MRHUB/collection.§REF§ In Burundi, the king seemingly entrusted administration mostly to close relatives and local chiefs: \"Ntare relied on his sons as administrators: he was strong enough to set up his sons, but not strong enough to incorporate these regions fully within central control. [...] During the late nineteenth century, under the reign of Mwezi Gisabo, a four-tiered system of administration emerged: a central area around Muramvya under the control of the king; an area under the administration of his sons or brothers most closely allied to the king; a broad swath further east and south administered by Batare chiefs, the descendants of Ntare; and another zone, covering the western and northwestern areas of the country, under the administration of others, not Baganwa (in fact, they were mostly Hutu authorities). [...] Administrative authorities in the east and south- east, often Batare (descendants of Ntare Rugamba), simply retained their administrative autonomy while acknowledging nominal central court ritual hegemony. Those in the northeast more characteristically undertook open revolt, often by those who sought to overthrow Mwezi.\" §REF§(Newbury 2001: 283-284) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/J5A6DM3P/collection.§REF§ Moreover, it is curious that, despite the wealth of literature available on this polity, so far we have been unable to find mentions of a bureaucracy, which strongly suggests (without outright confirming) that it was simply not present at this time."
        },
        {
            "id": 361,
            "polity": {
                "id": 684,
                "name": "ug_toro_k",
                "long_name": "Toro",
                "start_year": 1830,
                "end_year": 1896
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "absent",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " Inferred from the fact that full-time specialised bureaucracy does not seem to have emerged in the broader Great Lakes region prior to the colonial era. For example, in Nkore, \"The royal court served as a judicial and political center, but not as a bureaucratic focal point. The Mugabe's chief minister, the Enganzi, was not a prime minister in the usual sense of leader of government business. He was merely the King's favorite. Neither was there a cabinet nor governmental bureaux [...]. No distinction between the royal and state treasury was made and the heads of local administrative units were not required to attend court or reside at the capital as in Buganda, for instance.\"§REF§(Steinhart 1978: 144) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/D3FV7SKV/collection.§REF§ In Rwanda: \"In this sort of government, administration was not yet institutionalized.\"§REF§(Vansina 2004: 63) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/5J4MRHUB/collection.§REF§ In Burundi, the king seemingly entrusted administration mostly to close relatives and local chiefs: \"Ntare relied on his sons as administrators: he was strong enough to set up his sons, but not strong enough to incorporate these regions fully within central control. [...] During the late nineteenth century, under the reign of Mwezi Gisabo, a four-tiered system of administration emerged: a central area around Muramvya under the control of the king; an area under the administration of his sons or brothers most closely allied to the king; a broad swath further east and south administered by Batare chiefs, the descendants of Ntare; and another zone, covering the western and northwestern areas of the country, under the administration of others, not Baganwa (in fact, they were mostly Hutu authorities). [...] Administrative authorities in the east and south- east, often Batare (descendants of Ntare Rugamba), simply retained their administrative autonomy while acknowledging nominal central court ritual hegemony. Those in the northeast more characteristically undertook open revolt, often by those who sought to overthrow Mwezi.\" §REF§(Newbury 2001: 283-284) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/J5A6DM3P/collection.§REF§ "
        },
        {
            "id": 362,
            "polity": {
                "id": 686,
                "name": "tz_karagwe_k",
                "long_name": "Karagwe",
                "start_year": 1500,
                "end_year": 1916
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "absent",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " Inferred from the fact that full-time specialised bureaucracy does not seem to have emerged in the broader Great Lakes region prior to the colonial era. For example, in Nkore, \"The royal court served as a judicial and political center, but not as a bureaucratic focal point. The Mugabe's chief minister, the Enganzi, was not a prime minister in the usual sense of leader of government business. He was merely the King's favorite. Neither was there a cabinet nor governmental bureaux [...]. No distinction between the royal and state treasury was made and the heads of local administrative units were not required to attend court or reside at the capital as in Buganda, for instance.\"§REF§(Steinhart 1978: 144) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/D3FV7SKV/collection.§REF§ In Rwanda: \"In this sort of government, administration was not yet institutionalized.\"§REF§(Vansina 2004: 63) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/5J4MRHUB/collection.§REF§ In Burundi, the king seemingly entrusted administration mostly to close relatives and local chiefs: \"Ntare relied on his sons as administrators: he was strong enough to set up his sons, but not strong enough to incorporate these regions fully within central control. [...] During the late nineteenth century, under the reign of Mwezi Gisabo, a four-tiered system of administration emerged: a central area around Muramvya under the control of the king; an area under the administration of his sons or brothers most closely allied to the king; a broad swath further east and south administered by Batare chiefs, the descendants of Ntare; and another zone, covering the western and northwestern areas of the country, under the administration of others, not Baganwa (in fact, they were mostly Hutu authorities). [...] Administrative authorities in the east and south- east, often Batare (descendants of Ntare Rugamba), simply retained their administrative autonomy while acknowledging nominal central court ritual hegemony. Those in the northeast more characteristically undertook open revolt, often by those who sought to overthrow Mwezi.\" §REF§(Newbury 2001: 283-284) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/J5A6DM3P/collection.§REF§ "
        },
        {
            "id": 363,
            "polity": {
                "id": 688,
                "name": "ug_nkore_k_1",
                "long_name": "Nkore",
                "start_year": 1450,
                "end_year": 1749
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "absent",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " Inferred from the fact that even when this polity grew in complexity following the reforms of the 18th century, it still lacked a bureaucracy: \"The royal court served as a judicial and political center, but not as a bureaucratic focal point. The Mugabe's chief minister, the Enganzi, was not a prime minister in the usual sense of leader of government business. He was merely the King's favorite. Neither was there a cabinet nor governmental bureaux, although the colonial era saw the formation of a council of chiefs (Eishengyero) claiming traditional status. No distinction between the royal and state treasury was made and the heads of local administrative units were not required to attend court or reside at the capital as in Buganda, for instance. In fact, the only governmental business conducted at court was the hearing of cases, often involving the disputed possession of cattle or women by the Hima. The appointment and dismissal of military and administrative functionaries from among those aristocratic Hima and Hinda princes who regularly attended court was the Mugabe's sole administrative function.\"§REF§(Steinhart 1978: 144) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/D3FV7SKV/collection.§REF§ "
        },
        {
            "id": 364,
            "polity": {
                "id": 689,
                "name": "rw_ndorwa_k",
                "long_name": "Ndorwa",
                "start_year": 1700,
                "end_year": 1800
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "absent",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " Inferred from the fact that full-time specialised bureaucracy does not seem to have emerged in the broader Great Lakes region prior to the colonial era. For example, in Nkore, \"The royal court served as a judicial and political center, but not as a bureaucratic focal point. The Mugabe's chief minister, the Enganzi, was not a prime minister in the usual sense of leader of government business. He was merely the King's favorite. Neither was there a cabinet nor governmental bureaux [...]. No distinction between the royal and state treasury was made and the heads of local administrative units were not required to attend court or reside at the capital as in Buganda, for instance.\"§REF§(Steinhart 1978: 144) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/D3FV7SKV/collection.§REF§ In Rwanda: \"In this sort of government, administration was not yet institutionalized.\"§REF§(Vansina 2004: 63) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/5J4MRHUB/collection.§REF§ In Burundi, the king seemingly entrusted administration mostly to close relatives and local chiefs: \"Ntare relied on his sons as administrators: he was strong enough to set up his sons, but not strong enough to incorporate these regions fully within central control. [...] During the late nineteenth century, under the reign of Mwezi Gisabo, a four-tiered system of administration emerged: a central area around Muramvya under the control of the king; an area under the administration of his sons or brothers most closely allied to the king; a broad swath further east and south administered by Batare chiefs, the descendants of Ntare; and another zone, covering the western and northwestern areas of the country, under the administration of others, not Baganwa (in fact, they were mostly Hutu authorities). [...] Administrative authorities in the east and south- east, often Batare (descendants of Ntare Rugamba), simply retained their administrative autonomy while acknowledging nominal central court ritual hegemony. Those in the northeast more characteristically undertook open revolt, often by those who sought to overthrow Mwezi.\" §REF§(Newbury 2001: 283-284) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/J5A6DM3P/collection.§REF§ "
        },
        {
            "id": 365,
            "polity": {
                "id": 690,
                "name": "bu_burundi_k",
                "long_name": "Burundi",
                "start_year": 1680,
                "end_year": 1903
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "absent",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " Inferred from the fact that the king seemed to struggle to maintain control over provinces, and left them either in the hands of close relatives, or those of local chiefs: \"Though Ntare Rugamba is said to have doubled the area of the country, the administrative legacy of Ntare's rule was at least as important history to Burundi political history as were his military exploits. With such rapid expansion, Ntare relied on his sons as administrators: he was strong enough to set up his sons, but not strong enough to incorporate these regions fully within central control. [...] During the late nineteenth century, under the reign of Mwezi Gisabo, a four- tiered system of administration emerged: a central area around Muramvya under the control of the king; an area under the administration of his sons or brothers most closely allied to the king; a broad swath further east and south administered by Batare chiefs, the descendants of Ntare; and another zone, covering the western and northwestern areas of the country, under the administration of others, not Baganwa (in fact, they were mostly Hutu authorities). (See Figure 8.) From this pattern, three types of political relations emerged. Administrative authorities in the east and south- east, often Batare (descendants of Ntare Rugamba), simply retained their administrative autonomy while acknowledging nominal central court ritual hegemony. Those in the northeast more characteristically undertook open revolt, often by those who sought to overthrow Mwezi. [...] In the northwest, by contrast, pretenders to royal power had more tenuous claims to Ganwa identity; they drew on local traditions of resistance and benefited from the resources of the Lake Tanganyika trade network (as well as support from other states such as the Shi kingdoms west of Lake Kivu).\" §REF§(Newbury 2001: 283-284) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/J5A6DM3P/collection.§REF§ Note, too, that bureaucracy did not clearly emerge in neighbouring, culturally related polities. For example, in Nkore, \"The royal court served as a judicial and political center, but not as a bureaucratic focal point. The Mugabe's chief minister, the Enganzi, was not a prime minister in the usual sense of leader of government business. He was merely the King's favorite. Neither was there a cabinet nor governmental bureaux [...]. No distinction between the royal and state treasury was made and the heads of local administrative units were not required to attend court or reside at the capital as in Buganda, for instance.\"§REF§(Steinhart 1978: 144) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/D3FV7SKV/collection.§REF§ In Rwanda: \"In this sort of government, administration was not yet institutionalized.\"§REF§(Vansina 2004: 63) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/5J4MRHUB/collection.§REF§ Indeed, no information could be found on the existence of full-time specialised bureaucracy in the Ugandan kingdoms of Buganda and Bunyoro, both particularly well studied. "
        },
        {
            "id": 366,
            "polity": {
                "id": 691,
                "name": "rw_mubari_k",
                "long_name": "Mubari",
                "start_year": 1700,
                "end_year": 1896
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "absent",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " Inferred from the fact that full-time specialised bureaucracy does not seem to have emerged in the broader Great Lakes region prior to the colonial era. For example, in Nkore, \"The royal court served as a judicial and political center, but not as a bureaucratic focal point. The Mugabe's chief minister, the Enganzi, was not a prime minister in the usual sense of leader of government business. He was merely the King's favorite. Neither was there a cabinet nor governmental bureaux [...]. No distinction between the royal and state treasury was made and the heads of local administrative units were not required to attend court or reside at the capital as in Buganda, for instance.\"§REF§(Steinhart 1978: 144) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/D3FV7SKV/collection.§REF§ In Rwanda: \"In this sort of government, administration was not yet institutionalized.\"§REF§(Vansina 2004: 63) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/5J4MRHUB/collection.§REF§ In Burundi, the king seemingly entrusted administration mostly to close relatives and local chiefs: \"Ntare relied on his sons as administrators: he was strong enough to set up his sons, but not strong enough to incorporate these regions fully within central control. [...] During the late nineteenth century, under the reign of Mwezi Gisabo, a four-tiered system of administration emerged: a central area around Muramvya under the control of the king; an area under the administration of his sons or brothers most closely allied to the king; a broad swath further east and south administered by Batare chiefs, the descendants of Ntare; and another zone, covering the western and northwestern areas of the country, under the administration of others, not Baganwa (in fact, they were mostly Hutu authorities). [...] Administrative authorities in the east and south- east, often Batare (descendants of Ntare Rugamba), simply retained their administrative autonomy while acknowledging nominal central court ritual hegemony. Those in the northeast more characteristically undertook open revolt, often by those who sought to overthrow Mwezi.\" §REF§(Newbury 2001: 283-284) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/J5A6DM3P/collection.§REF§ "
        },
        {
            "id": 367,
            "polity": {
                "id": 692,
                "name": "rw_gisaka_k",
                "long_name": "Gisaka",
                "start_year": 1700,
                "end_year": 1867
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "absent",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " Inferred from the fact that full-time specialised bureaucracy does not seem to have emerged in the broader Great Lakes region prior to the colonial era. For example, in Nkore, \"The royal court served as a judicial and political center, but not as a bureaucratic focal point. The Mugabe's chief minister, the Enganzi, was not a prime minister in the usual sense of leader of government business. He was merely the King's favorite. Neither was there a cabinet nor governmental bureaux [...]. No distinction between the royal and state treasury was made and the heads of local administrative units were not required to attend court or reside at the capital as in Buganda, for instance.\"§REF§(Steinhart 1978: 144) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/D3FV7SKV/collection.§REF§ In Rwanda: \"In this sort of government, administration was not yet institutionalized.\"§REF§(Vansina 2004: 63) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/5J4MRHUB/collection.§REF§ In Burundi, the king seemingly entrusted administration mostly to close relatives and local chiefs: \"Ntare relied on his sons as administrators: he was strong enough to set up his sons, but not strong enough to incorporate these regions fully within central control. [...] During the late nineteenth century, under the reign of Mwezi Gisabo, a four-tiered system of administration emerged: a central area around Muramvya under the control of the king; an area under the administration of his sons or brothers most closely allied to the king; a broad swath further east and south administered by Batare chiefs, the descendants of Ntare; and another zone, covering the western and northwestern areas of the country, under the administration of others, not Baganwa (in fact, they were mostly Hutu authorities). [...] Administrative authorities in the east and south- east, often Batare (descendants of Ntare Rugamba), simply retained their administrative autonomy while acknowledging nominal central court ritual hegemony. Those in the northeast more characteristically undertook open revolt, often by those who sought to overthrow Mwezi.\" §REF§(Newbury 2001: 283-284) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/J5A6DM3P/collection.§REF§ "
        },
        {
            "id": 368,
            "polity": {
                "id": 693,
                "name": "tz_milansi_k",
                "long_name": "Fipa",
                "start_year": 1600,
                "end_year": 1890
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "absent",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " Inferred from the fact that full-time specialised bureaucracy does not seem to have emerged in the broader Great Lakes region prior to the colonial era. For example, in Nkore, \"The royal court served as a judicial and political center, but not as a bureaucratic focal point. The Mugabe's chief minister, the Enganzi, was not a prime minister in the usual sense of leader of government business. He was merely the King's favorite. Neither was there a cabinet nor governmental bureaux [...]. No distinction between the royal and state treasury was made and the heads of local administrative units were not required to attend court or reside at the capital as in Buganda, for instance.\"§REF§(Steinhart 1978: 144) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/D3FV7SKV/collection.§REF§ In Rwanda: \"In this sort of government, administration was not yet institutionalized.\"§REF§(Vansina 2004: 63) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/5J4MRHUB/collection.§REF§ In Burundi, the king seemingly entrusted administration mostly to close relatives and local chiefs: \"Ntare relied on his sons as administrators: he was strong enough to set up his sons, but not strong enough to incorporate these regions fully within central control. [...] During the late nineteenth century, under the reign of Mwezi Gisabo, a four-tiered system of administration emerged: a central area around Muramvya under the control of the king; an area under the administration of his sons or brothers most closely allied to the king; a broad swath further east and south administered by Batare chiefs, the descendants of Ntare; and another zone, covering the western and northwestern areas of the country, under the administration of others, not Baganwa (in fact, they were mostly Hutu authorities). [...] Administrative authorities in the east and south- east, often Batare (descendants of Ntare Rugamba), simply retained their administrative autonomy while acknowledging nominal central court ritual hegemony. Those in the northeast more characteristically undertook open revolt, often by those who sought to overthrow Mwezi.\" §REF§(Newbury 2001: 283-284) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/J5A6DM3P/collection.§REF§ "
        },
        {
            "id": 369,
            "polity": {
                "id": 694,
                "name": "rw_bugesera_k",
                "long_name": "Bugesera",
                "start_year": 1700,
                "end_year": 1799
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "absent",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " Inferred from the fact that full-time specialised bureaucracy does not seem to have emerged in the broader Great Lakes region prior to the colonial era. For example, in Nkore, \"The royal court served as a judicial and political center, but not as a bureaucratic focal point. The Mugabe's chief minister, the Enganzi, was not a prime minister in the usual sense of leader of government business. He was merely the King's favorite. Neither was there a cabinet nor governmental bureaux [...]. No distinction between the royal and state treasury was made and the heads of local administrative units were not required to attend court or reside at the capital as in Buganda, for instance.\"§REF§(Steinhart 1978: 144) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/D3FV7SKV/collection.§REF§ In Rwanda: \"In this sort of government, administration was not yet institutionalized.\"§REF§(Vansina 2004: 63) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/5J4MRHUB/collection.§REF§ In Burundi, the king seemingly entrusted administration mostly to close relatives and local chiefs: \"Ntare relied on his sons as administrators: he was strong enough to set up his sons, but not strong enough to incorporate these regions fully within central control. [...] During the late nineteenth century, under the reign of Mwezi Gisabo, a four-tiered system of administration emerged: a central area around Muramvya under the control of the king; an area under the administration of his sons or brothers most closely allied to the king; a broad swath further east and south administered by Batare chiefs, the descendants of Ntare; and another zone, covering the western and northwestern areas of the country, under the administration of others, not Baganwa (in fact, they were mostly Hutu authorities). [...] Administrative authorities in the east and south- east, often Batare (descendants of Ntare Rugamba), simply retained their administrative autonomy while acknowledging nominal central court ritual hegemony. Those in the northeast more characteristically undertook open revolt, often by those who sought to overthrow Mwezi.\" §REF§(Newbury 2001: 283-284) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/J5A6DM3P/collection.§REF§ "
        },
        {
            "id": 370,
            "polity": {
                "id": 696,
                "name": "tz_buhayo_k",
                "long_name": "Buhaya",
                "start_year": 1700,
                "end_year": 1890
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "absent",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " Inferred from the fact that full-time specialised bureaucracy does not seem to have emerged in the broader Great Lakes region prior to the colonial era. For example, in Nkore, \"The royal court served as a judicial and political center, but not as a bureaucratic focal point. The Mugabe's chief minister, the Enganzi, was not a prime minister in the usual sense of leader of government business. He was merely the King's favorite. Neither was there a cabinet nor governmental bureaux [...]. No distinction between the royal and state treasury was made and the heads of local administrative units were not required to attend court or reside at the capital as in Buganda, for instance.\"§REF§(Steinhart 1978: 144) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/D3FV7SKV/collection.§REF§ In Rwanda: \"In this sort of government, administration was not yet institutionalized.\"§REF§(Vansina 2004: 63) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/5J4MRHUB/collection.§REF§ In Burundi, the king seemingly entrusted administration mostly to close relatives and local chiefs: \"Ntare relied on his sons as administrators: he was strong enough to set up his sons, but not strong enough to incorporate these regions fully within central control. [...] During the late nineteenth century, under the reign of Mwezi Gisabo, a four-tiered system of administration emerged: a central area around Muramvya under the control of the king; an area under the administration of his sons or brothers most closely allied to the king; a broad swath further east and south administered by Batare chiefs, the descendants of Ntare; and another zone, covering the western and northwestern areas of the country, under the administration of others, not Baganwa (in fact, they were mostly Hutu authorities). [...] Administrative authorities in the east and south- east, often Batare (descendants of Ntare Rugamba), simply retained their administrative autonomy while acknowledging nominal central court ritual hegemony. Those in the northeast more characteristically undertook open revolt, often by those who sought to overthrow Mwezi.\" §REF§(Newbury 2001: 283-284) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/J5A6DM3P/collection.§REF§ "
        },
        {
            "id": 371,
            "polity": {
                "id": 608,
                "name": "gm_kaabu_emp",
                "long_name": "Kaabu",
                "start_year": 1500,
                "end_year": 1867
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "SSP",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "unknown",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " levels. \"We emphasise from the beginning that our historical knowledge of kings and the length of their reigns, and of the political structure and organisation of Kaabu remains very limited.\"§REF§(Giesing and Vydrine 2007: 4, quoted in Green 2009: 92) Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/collections/GWWIKDDM/items/V2GTBN8A/collection.§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 372,
            "polity": {
                "id": 622,
                "name": "bf_west_burkina_faso_yellow_6",
                "long_name": "West Burkina Faso Yellow II",
                "start_year": 501,
                "end_year": 700
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "SSP",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "unknown",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " The following quote suggests the emergence of social differentiation in this period, but little appears to be understood about this phenomenon apart from the appearance of specialised smiths and the formation of senior and cadet social segments. \"During Yellow II, the inhabitants of Mound 4 began a process that eventually led to centralization of iron production, as described in detail above. Iron ore extraction involves profound digging in the earth, the realm of spirits, and historically in Bwa society the practice is reserved solely for specialized smiths, who also excavate burials (see discussions below). The mid first millennium A.D. therefore witnessed a transformation from redundant social and economic roles for houses to specialization in at least one craft activity. While houses were still highly independent, even producing their own pottery, a formalized village structure was likely present with both cadet and senior social segments, founded upon common descent with a common ancestor.\"§REF§(Dueppen 2012: 28)§REF§ "
        },
        {
            "id": 373,
            "polity": {
                "id": 663,
                "name": "ni_oyo_emp_1",
                "long_name": "Oyo",
                "start_year": 1300,
                "end_year": 1535
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "SSP",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "unknown",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " \"Contexts that could shed light on the dynamics of social structure and hierarchies in the metropolis, such as the royal burial site of Oyo monarchs and the residences of the elite population, have not been investigated. The mapping of the palace structures has not been followed by systematic excavations (Soper, 1992); and questions of the economy, military system, and ideology of the empire have not been addressed archaeologically, although their general patterns are known from historical studies (e.g, Johnson, 1921; Law, 1977).\"§REF§(Ogundiran 2005: 151-152)§REF§ Regarding this period, however, one of the historical studies mentioned in this quote also notes:  \"Of the earliestperiod of Oyo history, before the sixteenth century, very little is known.\"§REF§(Law 1977: 33)§REF§ Law does not then go on to provide specific information directly relevant to this variable."
        },
        {
            "id": 374,
            "polity": {
                "id": 570,
                "name": "es_spanish_emp_2",
                "long_name": "Spanish Empire II",
                "start_year": 1716,
                "end_year": 1814
            },
            "year_from": 1716,
            "year_to": 1814,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": "“Moreover, between 1800 and 1802, a set of new regulations placed the marine registry and the bureaucrats who ran it under centralized military control, replacing local civilian administrators.”<ref>(Philips and Philips 2010: 200) Philips, William D. and Carla Rahn Philips. 2010. A Concise History of Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.zotero.org/groups/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/ZT84ZFTP</ref> “Working from zero, and with the help of a new bureaucracy organized on the French pattern, Philip V's government achieved a spectacular rise in tax income, derived almost entirely from national rather than overseas sources.”<ref>(Kamen 2003: 448) Kamen, Henry. 2003. Empire: How Spain Became a World Power, 1492-1763. New York: Harper Collins. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/YRK2VXUS</ref>"
        },
        {
            "id": 375,
            "polity": {
                "id": 579,
                "name": "gb_england_plantagenet",
                "long_name": "Plantagenet England",
                "start_year": 1154,
                "end_year": 1485
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " The King’s Household, The Exchequer, The Chancery and the law courts employed hundreds of full-time staff. §REF§(Prestwich 2005: 60-70) Prestwich, Michael. 2005. Plantagenet England 1225-1360. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/XTBKFDCI§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 376,
            "polity": {
                "id": 568,
                "name": "cz_bohemian_k_2",
                "long_name": "Kingdom of Bohemia - Luxembourgian and Jagiellonian Dynasty",
                "start_year": 1310,
                "end_year": 1526
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " “The Hussite Revolution disrupted the administration of law throughout the Bohemian lands. The wars destroyed libraries, such as the one in the Opatovsky monastery, and caused Prague’s law university and some law courts to be suspended. Some other courts that fell into Hussite hands, such as the municipal court in Kutna Hora (Kuttenberg), bring to light that the Hussites also had a more subtle effect on the practice of law.”§REF§(Grant 2014: 43) Grant, Jeanne E. 2014. For the Common Good: The Bohemian Land Law and the Beginning of the Hussite Revolution, East Central and Eastern in the Middle Ages, 450–1450. Leiden; Boston: Brill.  https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/GCJGUZZZ§REF§ “John of Luxemburg was bound not only by relations with the Empire, but he also had to take into account the troubled state of the Bohemian crown lands. His agreements with the leaders of the Bohemian and Moravian aristocracy had not been as successful as both sides had hoped. The King continued to employ the services of foreign advisors and bureaucrats, as it was difficult for him to adapt to the Czech situation, the language and culture of which was quite alien to him, more accustomed as he was to life in France and the Rhineland.”§REF§(Pánek and Oldřich 2009: 129) Pánek, Jaroslav and Oldřich, Tůma. 2009. A History of the Czech Lands. University of Chicago Press.  https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/4NAX9KBJ§REF§ “Christianity also contributed to state-building, providing a core of educated, experiences administrators and an organisation patterned after the Roman empire.”§REF§(Agnew 2004: 23) Agnew, Hugh LeCaine. 2004. The Czechs and the Lands of the Bohemian Crown. California: Hoover Institution Press. http://archive.org/details/czechslandsofboh0000agne. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/6LBQ5ARI§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 377,
            "polity": {
                "id": 305,
                "name": "it_lombard_k",
                "long_name": "Lombard Kingdom",
                "start_year": 568,
                "end_year": 774
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " The imperial and legal courts had notaries, chancellors, judges etc.§REF§Christie 1998: 115. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/975BEGKF§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 378,
            "polity": {
                "id": 575,
                "name": "us_united_states_of_america_reconstruction",
                "long_name": "Us Reconstruction-Progressive",
                "start_year": 1866,
                "end_year": 1933
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": null
        },
        {
            "id": 379,
            "polity": {
                "id": 563,
                "name": "us_antebellum",
                "long_name": "Antebellum US",
                "start_year": 1776,
                "end_year": 1865
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": null
        },
        {
            "id": 380,
            "polity": {
                "id": 567,
                "name": "at_habsburg_2",
                "long_name": "Austria - Habsburg Dynasty II",
                "start_year": 1649,
                "end_year": 1918
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " “The expanding and increasingly centralized bureaucracies of the eighteenth century continued to employ many of the regional nobles who might otherwise have lost political influence as the diets gradually ceded more areas of competence to Vienna. In the case of Bohemia, for example, Maria Theresa even retained the services of several Bohemian nobles who had momentarily abandoned her for the Bavarians in 1741, installing them in both the provincial and central bureaucracies. The ambitious character of the reform programs produced a sharp increase in civil servants’ administrative reach into society. It also produced a growing demand for new servants of the state to take on a rapidly expanding workload. In Hungary during Maria Theresa’s reign, the ruling council saw its workload rise by 400 percent, while the numbers of officials who dealt with correspondence alone rose from fifty to over one hundred twenty! Clearly administrative change required more and better educated state employees to manage reform. Although nobles and aristocrats usually occupied the highest echelons of this expanding bureaucracy, educated sons of the middle classes were increasingly filling positions at the middle and lower levels.”§REF§(Judson 2016: 31-32) Judson, Pieter M. 2016. The Habsburg Empire: A New History. Cambridge, USA; London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/BN5TQZBW§REF§ “The burst of “modernization” in the middle decades of the eighteenth century gave the Habsburg monarchy institutions reasonably advanced for their time. Centralization of power was achieved in large part through the growth of a central bureaucracy, in the Habsburg lands as elsewhere. One estimate has 6,000 members of the state bureaucracy in 1740, 10,000 in 1762, and 20,000 in 1782. These numbers increasingly came from people of non-noble classes, which helped expand the regime’s base of support. Joseph’s travels around the monarchy convinced him that the professionalism of local officials was often low, which inspired his mission to improve the bureaucracy. Thus training was improved, pay increased and tied more to merit, and a pension system introduced. These bureaucrats were not personal servants of the monarch, as in previous eras, but instead served the state. This idea is unequivocal in Joseph’s so-called Pastoral Letter of 1783 in which he gave instructions to all state officials. Here again he stressed the idea of service, writing that “he who does not have love for the fatherland and his fellow citizens, who does not find himself inspired with a special zeal for preserving the good,” would not succeed in the bureaucracy.”§REF§(Curtis 2013: 242) Curtis, Benjamin. 2013. The Habsburgs: The History of a Dynasty. London; New York: Bloomsbury. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/TRKUBP92§REF§ "
        },
        {
            "id": 381,
            "polity": {
                "id": 295,
                "name": "tm_khwarezmid_emp",
                "long_name": "Khwarezmid Empire",
                "start_year": 1157,
                "end_year": 1231
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " There were government officials in the capital and in the provincial cities.§REF§Buniyatov 2015: 72-79. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/SAEVEJFH§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 382,
            "polity": {
                "id": 797,
                "name": "de_empire_1",
                "long_name": "Holy Roman Empire - Ottonian-Salian Dynasty",
                "start_year": 919,
                "end_year": 1125
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": "Imperial and papal officials. Royal estates were administered, taxes were collected, officials often sat in on tribunals.§REF§Power 2006: 105, 107, 214. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/4V4WE3ZK§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 383,
            "polity": {
                "id": 565,
                "name": "at_habsburg_1",
                "long_name": "Austria - Habsburg Dynasty I",
                "start_year": 1454,
                "end_year": 1648
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " Workers in the various imperial and regional governments and councils.§REF§(Curtis 2013: 101) Curtis, Benjamin. 2013. The Habsburgs: The History of a Dynasty. London; New York: Bloomsbury. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/TRKUBP92§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 384,
            "polity": {
                "id": 351,
                "name": "am_artaxiad_dyn",
                "long_name": "Armenian Kingdom",
                "start_year": -188,
                "end_year": 6
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " Royal functionaries served in the government and “supervised the administrative bureaucracies, fiscal policy, transportation, commerce and customs, agriculture, and public works.”§REF§Payaslian 2007: 14. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/H8NEU6KD§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 385,
            "polity": {
                "id": 573,
                "name": "ru_golden_horde",
                "long_name": "Golden Horde",
                "start_year": 1240,
                "end_year": 1440
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " The Golden Horde had a permanent bureaucratic centre in the capital of Sarai.§REF§Halperin 1987: 26. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/VCPWVNM.§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 386,
            "polity": {
                "id": 360,
                "name": "ir_saffarid_emp",
                "long_name": "Saffarid Caliphate",
                "start_year": 861,
                "end_year": 1003
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " There were government officials and office holders in the Saffarid empire.§REF§Bosworth 1994: 162. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/7W46D62E§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 387,
            "polity": {
                "id": 587,
                "name": "gb_british_emp_1",
                "long_name": "British Empire I",
                "start_year": 1690,
                "end_year": 1849
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " Professional bureaucrats throughout the UK and all of the Empire’s territories."
        },
        {
            "id": 388,
            "polity": {
                "id": 566,
                "name": "fr_france_napoleonic",
                "long_name": "Napoleonic France",
                "start_year": 1816,
                "end_year": 1870
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " Bureaucrats and civil servants were employed across France. §REF§Crook 2002: 57, 133. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/29D9EQQE§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 389,
            "polity": {
                "id": 567,
                "name": "at_habsburg_2",
                "long_name": "Austria - Habsburg Dynasty II",
                "start_year": 1649,
                "end_year": 1918
            },
            "year_from": 1867,
            "year_to": 1918,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": "“Expanding infrastructures and new public entitlements compelled the governments of Austria and Hungary to add layers of bureaucrats to fulfill new functions, and then more layers to monitor the effectiveness of the first layers. Competence in producing desired outcomes became critical to maintaining political legitimacy, in local town halls and in imperial ministries alike. Parliaments, crownland diets, and town halls now engaged in archival record- keeping on a scale as yet unknown, while enforcing a maze of legal standards for everything from workplace safety to public health to transportation to conditions of emigration. Bureaucracy begat more bureaucracy as popular expectations fueled the state’s expansion into the everyday lives of its citizens.”§REF§(Judson 2016: 336) Judson, Pieter M. 2016. The Habsburg Empire: A New History. Cambridge, USA; London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/BN5TQZBW§REF§ “But the system of ‘double administration’ (Doppelverwaltung) that the Liberals sanctioned in 1861—each Crownland had a professional, state-appointed bureaucratic hierarchy in the persons and staffs of the District Captains (Bezirkshauptmänner) and the imperial governors (Statthalter or Landespräsidenten) juxtaposed to a politically appointed, regional bureaucracy headed by the elected Provincial Executive Committee of the diet— created a powerful space for the training of local political elites, and rich sources of local political patronage, new job creation, and regional political education uncontrolled by the Crown.”§REF§(Boyer 2022: 117) Boyer, John W. 2022. Austria, 1867–1955. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/CG3P4KKD§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 390,
            "polity": {
                "id": 578,
                "name": "mo_alawi_dyn_1",
                "long_name": "Alaouite Dynasty I",
                "start_year": 1631,
                "end_year": 1727
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " “Following the conquest of the kingdoms of the Sudan, Mawlay Ahmad received so much gold dust that envious men were all troubled and observers absolutely stupefied. So from then on al-Mansur paid his officials in pure gold and in dinars of proper weight only.”§REF§(Fage and Oliver 1975: 150) Fage, J. D. and Oliver, Roland Anthony. 1975. eds., The Cambridge History of Africa: Volume 4, from c. 1600 to c. 1790. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/Z6BCU87M§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 391,
            "polity": {
                "id": 574,
                "name": "gb_anglo_saxon_1",
                "long_name": "Anglo-Saxon England I",
                "start_year": 410,
                "end_year": 926
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": " “The basis of the internal organization of both the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms and those of their Celtic neighbours was a large rural territory which contained a number of subsidiary settlements dependent upon a central residence which the Anglo-Saxons called a villa in Latin and a tun in Old English.55 These vills were centres of royal administration and visited by the kings and their entourages on regular circuits of their kingdoms when food rents which had to be rendered at the royal vill would be consumed.56 In Anglo-Saxon England of the seventh and eighth centuries groups of royal vills and their dependent territories formed regiones, discrete territories within kingdoms for administrative purposes.57 If this recent research is correct it suggests that the basic infrastructure of the early Anglo-Saxon kingdoms was inherited from late Roman or subRoman Britain.”§REF§(Yorke 1990: 8) York, Barbara. 1990. Kings and Kingdoms of Early Anglo-Saxon England. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203447307. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/YXTNCWJN§REF§ "
        },
        {
            "id": 392,
            "polity": {
                "id": 561,
                "name": "us_hohokam_culture",
                "long_name": "Hohokam Culture",
                "start_year": 300,
                "end_year": 1500
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "SSP",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "unknown",
            "comment": null,
            "description": null
        },
        {
            "id": 393,
            "polity": {
                "id": 786,
                "name": "gb_british_emp_2",
                "long_name": "British Empire II",
                "start_year": 1850,
                "end_year": 1968
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": "There were thousands of bureaucrats posted throughout the Empire. In Britain, expanding system of full-time salaried bureaucrats; in India, a system of (mostly non-native) salaried officials known as the Indian Civil Service, introduced in 1858."
        },
        {
            "id": 394,
            "polity": {
                "id": 302,
                "name": "gb_tudor_stuart",
                "long_name": "England Tudor-Stuart",
                "start_year": 1486,
                "end_year": 1689
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": "“Although the extent to which the royal writ ran directly varied considerably, England was unified under the aegis of royal justice. Furthermore, England was unique in the identity of intendancy and judiciary: in practice, local governors were not merely administrators, they were also law officers. This was no less true of vestrymen and overseers of the poor than it was of circuit judges and justices of the peace. The interdependence of the legal and administrative arms of the state explains both the centrality of judicial machinery to the execution of public policy and the importance of legal precedent to contemporary political rhetoric: in short, it implies the rule of law, ‘an article in the political creed and a part of the political instinct of all Englishmen’.”§REF§(Hindle 2002: 30) Hindle, Steve. 2002. The State and Social Change in Early Modern England, 1550–1640 (London: Palgrave https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/GVIZDIC9§REF§ “And yet, while the war and the financial revolution reduced the personal power of the sovereign, they vastly increased that of the Crown, that is, His Majesty’s government. That government now had at its disposal enormous armies and navies and the expanding bureaucracy necessary to oversee and supply them. For example, William’s army numbered 76,000 men, almost twice that of James II. It has been estimated that the central administration comprised some 4,000 officials in 1688… The Treasury increasingly controlled this vast bureaucracy, and sought to run the government more efficiently and thriftily. In order to weed out old, corrupt practices, it initiated adequate salaries and pension schemes, drew up handbooks of conduct, and calculated statistics to make realistic appraisals of the tasks at hand. As this implies, the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries saw a growing sense of professionalism among government workers. Men like William Blathwayt at the War Office (ca. 1650–1717), Samuel Pepys (1633–1703) at the Navy Office, and William Lowndes (1652–1724) at the Treasury were career bureaucrats who remained in office despite shifts of faction and party.”§REF§(Bucholz et al 2013: 327) Bucholz, Robert, Newton Key, and R.O. Bucholz. 2013. Early Modern England 1485-1714: A Narrative History. Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uvic/detail.action?docID=1166775. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/XQGJH96U§REF§ The King’s Household, The Exchequer, The Chancery and the law courts employed hundreds of full-time staff. §REF§(Prestwich 2005: 60-70) Prestwich, Michael. 2005. Plantagenet England 1225-1360. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/XTBKFDCI§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 395,
            "polity": {
                "id": 601,
                "name": "ru_soviet_union",
                "long_name": "Soviet Union",
                "start_year": 1918,
                "end_year": 1991
            },
            "year_from": 1923,
            "year_to": 1991,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": "The Revolution of 1917 swept away the tsarist civil service. The Communist Party at first held that a strong administrative organization was bound to damage the revolution by dampening spontaneity and other revolutionary virtues. But it soon became clear that a regime dedicated to social engineering, economic planning, and world revolution needed trained administrators. The party fell back, albeit reluctantly, upon the expertise of the more reliable tsarist civil servants. It did, however, surround the new civil service with elaborate controls in an attempt to ensure that its members remained loyal to party directives.\r\n\r\nAs the Communist Party itself became bureaucratized and as the more enthusiastic revolutionary leaders were eliminated, special industrial academies were set up for party members who had shown administrative talent. With the First Five-Year Plan (1928–32) the status of civil servants was improved, and their conditions of service were made less rigid, even though the party never relaxed its tight system of control over all branches of the state apparatus. In 1935 the State Commission on the Civil Service was created and attached to the Commissariat of Finance with responsibility for ensuring general control of personnel practice. This commission laid down formal patterns of administrative structure, reformed existing bureaucratic practices, fixed levels of staffing, standardized systems of job classification, and eliminated unnecessary functions and staff. The inspectorate of the Ministry of Finance ensured that the commission’s general policies were carried out in the ministries. The commission itself remained under the close supervision of the Council of People’s Commissars to ensure that it complied with party directives, and the commission’s members were appointed directly by the council.\r\n§REF§(Public Administration - Soviet Union, Bureaucracy, Planning | Britannica)<a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/FARM9XPB\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"fw-bolder\"> <b> Zotero link: FARM9XPB</b></a>§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 396,
            "polity": {
                "id": 571,
                "name": "ru_romanov_dyn_2",
                "long_name": "Russian Empire, Romanov Dynasty II",
                "start_year": 1776,
                "end_year": 1917
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": "In 1713 Peter the Great established Landrats in each of the governorates, staffed by between eight and twelve professional civil servants, who assisted a royally-appointed governor.§REF§Marc Raeff, Peter the Great Changes Russia (Heath, 1972).<a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/ETGA4BHM\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"fw-bolder\"> <b> Zotero link: ETGA4BHM</b></a>§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 397,
            "polity": {
                "id": 600,
                "name": "ru_romanov_dyn_1",
                "long_name": "Russian Empire, Romanov Dynasty I",
                "start_year": 1614,
                "end_year": 1775
            },
            "year_from": 1614,
            "year_to": 1645,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "absent",
            "comment": null,
            "description": "Early 17th Century (Time of Troubles): In the early 17th century, during the Time of Troubles, Russia's administrative system was relatively less developed. The bureaucracy was not highly specialized, and many officials were members of the nobility who held multiple roles, including military duties.\r\n\r\nReforms in the 17th Century: Throughout the 17th century, especially under the reign of Tsar Alexis Mikhailovich (1645-1676), there were efforts to centralize and streamline the Russian government. This period saw an increase in the number of government departments (prikazy), indicating a move towards more specialized administrative roles. However, it's important to note that many of these roles were still not entirely specialized, and the concept of a full-time, professional bureaucrat was still developing.\r\n\r\nPeter the Great’s Reforms: The most significant changes came with Peter the Great (1682-1725), who implemented widespread reforms across Russian society, including the government. He established a more modern, bureaucratic state with a clearer division of labor and the creation of new government bodies. Peter's reforms marked the beginning of the true professionalization of the Russian bureaucracy, with officials dedicated solely to administrative tasks.§REF§Pipes, Richard. Russia under the Old Regime. 2nd ed, Penguin Books, 1995.<a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/LEIXLKAP\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"fw-bolder\"> <b> Zotero link: LEIXLKAP</b></a>§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 398,
            "polity": {
                "id": 600,
                "name": "ru_romanov_dyn_1",
                "long_name": "Russian Empire, Romanov Dynasty I",
                "start_year": 1614,
                "end_year": 1775
            },
            "year_from": 1682,
            "year_to": 1775,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": ""
        },
        {
            "id": 399,
            "polity": {
                "id": 600,
                "name": "ru_romanov_dyn_1",
                "long_name": "Russian Empire, Romanov Dynasty I",
                "start_year": 1614,
                "end_year": 1775
            },
            "year_from": 1645,
            "year_to": 1682,
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "A~P",
            "comment": null,
            "description": ""
        },
        {
            "id": 400,
            "polity": {
                "id": 539,
                "name": "ye_qatabanian_commonwealth",
                "long_name": "Qatabanian Commonwealth",
                "start_year": -450,
                "end_year": -111
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": null,
            "description": "The following quote broadly refers to pre-Islamic Arabia. \"Arabian societies with good income from agriculture or trade were not only likely to be more hierarchical than pastoralist tribes, but also to have greater division of labour. In the inscriptions of Hatra, for example, we read about the professions of stonemasons, sculptors, metalworkers, carpenters, scribes, tutors, priests, physicians, accountants, doorkeepers, merchants and winesellers. In south Arabia a number of administrative offices are known, such as kabîr, qayn and maqtawî, though their exact nature and function is unclear.\"§REF§(Hoyland 2001, 120) Hoyland, R. 2001. Arabia and the Arabs: From the Bronze Age to the Coming of Islam. Routledge. Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/search/hoylan/titleCreatorYear/items/AUHRSTGG/item-list§REF§"
        },
        {
            "id": 401,
            "polity": {
                "id": 405,
                "name": "in_gahadavala_dyn",
                "long_name": "Gahadavala Dynasty",
                "start_year": 1085,
                "end_year": 1193
            },
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "name": "Full_time_bureaucrat",
            "full_time_bureaucrat": "present",
            "comment": "\"Selahatha had mainly to do with the countryside and was probably a high officer with executive and revenue duties.\"  <a class=\"fw-bold\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/5CEUP25X\">[Bakshi_Gajrani_Singh 2005, p. 397]</a> \"The talara looked to the security of a town. Batadhipa was perhaps the officer-in-charge of a posse of policemen. ...\" <a class=\"fw-bold\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/5CEUP25X\">[Bakshi_Gajrani_Singh 2005, pp. 396-397]</a>",
            "description": "\"[T]he Gahadavalas either themselves evolved an elaborate taxation system or improved upon the existing practices. As far as the official records are concerned, we can say that they had a large number of revenue terms such as bhaga-bhoga-kara, hiranya, pravanikara, turuskadanda, jalak ara, gokara, visayadana, kumaragadyanaka, yamali-kambala, kutaka, valadi, vimsaticchavatha (vimsatyathu, visatiathuprastha), aksapataladaya (ak shapatalaprastha), pratiharaprastha, varavajjhe (varavajha), dasabandha, loha-lavanakara, parnakara, taradaya, svanaukabhataka, dagapasadidir gha-govica, vahyavahyamtarasiddhi, etc. No doubt, all these myriad terms if collected in word and deed would have accounted for a handsome royal share of revenue. Such a large number of taxes would have required a well-qualified class of officials involved in tax collection and maintenance of accounts and records. U.N. Ghoshal has credited the Gahadavala kings for having made remarkable changes in the prevailing revenue system.\"§REF§(Kumar 2015: 30-31) Kumar, S. 2015. Rural Society and Rural Economy in the Ganga Valley during the Gahadavalas. Social Scientist , May–June 2015, Vol. 43, No. 5/6 (May–June 2015), pp. 29-45. Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/PQEZNJ3T/library§REF§"
        }
    ]
}